Cases 1 - 10 of 640
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition For Removal - Sex Discrimination/Harass
Hawkins v. D.R. Horton, Inc. - Gulf Coast et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Latoya Latrice Hawkins
Defendant:
D.R. Horton, Inc. - Gulf Coast, Gateway Mortgage Group, Bank of America Securities, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Farber v. City of Gainesville
as 1:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Bethany Kaley Farber
Defendant:
City of Gainesville, Texas, City of Gainesville and Does 1 to 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farber v. City of Gainesville
as 4:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Bethany Kaley Farber
Defendant:
City of Gainesville and Does 1 to 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
