Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Linnemann v. DynCorp International LLC
as 4:2019cv00630
Plaintiff:
Devin Linnemann
Defendant:
DynCorp International LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maria Jordan, et al v. DOWCP, et al
as 19-60178
Petitioner:
MARIA JORDAN and JACK JORDAN
Respondent:
DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C., DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Maria Jordan, et al v. DOWCP, et al
as 18-60329
Petitioner:
MARIA JORDAN and JACK JORDAN
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C. and CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Everett Blakes v. Dyncorp International, L.L.C.
as 17-31003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVERETT BLAKES
Defendant - Appellee:
DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C.
Maria Jordan, et al v. DOWCP, et al
as 17-60851
Petitioner:
MARIA JORDAN and JACK JORDAN
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C. and CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Maria Jordan v. DOWCP, et al
as 17-60424
Petitioner:
MARIA JORDAN
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C. and CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Blakes v. Dyncorp
as 3:2017cv00001
Plaintiff:
Everett Blakes
Defendant:
Dyncorp International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
