Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Montez v. Garcia
as 5:2023cv01467
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rick Montez
Defendant:
Judge Orlando L. Garcia, Xavier Rodriguez, David Alan Ezra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Lee v. Ezra et al
as 5:2022cv00719
Plaintiff:
Clarence Lee and Lee El, Clarence
Defendant:
David Alan Ezra and Sgt. Compton and Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Diaz
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and David Alan Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Pate v. Bauman et al
as 6:2019cv00454
Plaintiff:
David Alan Pate
Defendant:
Byron Townsend, H Chuck Bauman and Kathy Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lott v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2018cv00165
Petitioner:
David Alan Lott
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Channel (H) Inc v. Cquentia Series, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00916
Defendant:
Cquentia Series, LLC , HTG Series and David Alan Meeker
Plaintiff:
Channel (H) Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Arnold v. ASI Lloyds et al
as 7:2017cv00190
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds, Inc. and David Alan Robbins
Plaintiff:
Andrea Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Vogel v. USA
as 4:2013cv00323
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Alan Vogel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Van Houten v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2012cv00051
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
David Alan Van Houten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FILING ERROR
as 7:2012cv00047
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
David Alan Van Houten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
