Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
David Diaz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50914
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Laredo v. Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium, et al
as 1:2022cv01759
Plaintiff:
David Diaz Laredo
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium and Federal Correctional Institution Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Alonzo et al v. Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium, et al
as 1:2022cv01588
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alonzo, Jaun Frausto, Bairo Cardona Perez and others
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium and Federal Correctional Institution Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
David Diaz-Barriga v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60459
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
DAVID DIAZ-BARRIGA
Diaz v. GBJ, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv03401
Plaintiff:
David Diaz
Defendant:
GBJ, Inc., TBL Group, Inc. and Echo Tours & Charters, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. David Diaz, Jr.
as 17-30294
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID DIAZ, JR.
Robert Keys v. Candace Torres, et al
as 16-41518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DANIEL KEYS
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER II CANDACE TORRES, CLERK 3 KIESHA COLLINS, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION and others
Monroe et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2010cv00401
Plaintiff:
William Monroe
Defendant:
Jennifer Smith, David Diaz and E. Metz
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
