Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Gaines v. Collier
as 3:2024cv00457
Petitioner:
Ernest Edward Gaines
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gaines v. Lumpkin
as 23-11161
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ernest Edward Gaines
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, NFN Babcock, Warden and NFN Garrett, Officer
Edwards v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co
as 1:2022cv05183
Plaintiff:
Ernest Edwards
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Edwards v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co
as 2:2022cv05183
Plaintiff:
Ernest Edwards
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co and Liberty Personal Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Gaines v. Lumpkin
as 21-10897
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ernest Edward Gaines
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, NFN Babcock, Warden and NFN Garrett, Officer
Gaines v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2020cv03598
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, NFN Garrett and NFN Babcock
Petitioner:
Ernest Edward Gaines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gaines v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Ernest Edward Gaines
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gaines v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2017cv00309
Petitioner:
Ernest Edward Gaines
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mahoney v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, LLC, et al.
as 2:2016cv09169
Plaintiff:
Ernest Edward Mahoney
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
