Cases 1 - 10 of 1,273
McHenry v. Lumpkin
as 24-10481
Petitioner:
Jimmy Floyd McHenry
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Floyd v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
Timothy Floyd
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smiley v. Floyd Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Forrest Smiley
Defendant:
Floyd Inc., Rocket Expediting LLC and Roger Bolton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Floyd et al v. Aziyo Biologics Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Floyd and Irma H. Floyd
Defendant:
Aziyo Biologics Inc., Berkeley Biologics LLC, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Veal v. ASI Lloyds
as 4:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Vickie Veal and Floyd Veal
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
