Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Diggles v. Tringle et al
as 3:2021cv01243
Defendant:
Greatwide Dallas Mavis, LLC, Jared Tringle and Evans Delivery Co Inc
Plaintiff:
Eska Laverne Diggles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Transplace Texas, LP v. GREATWIDE DALLAS MAVIS, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00615
Defendant:
GREATWIDE DALLAS MAVIS, LLC and BRICKER TRANSPORT, LLC
Plaintiff:
Transplace Texas, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Newsome v. Jaite et al
as 3:2018cv00548
Defendant:
Greatwide Dallas Mavis, LLC, Curtis Jaite and John Does 1-99
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Newsome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gillespie v. Greatwide Dallas Mavis LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01620
Plaintiff:
Willie Gillespie
Defendant:
Greatwide Dallas Mavis LLC and Victor Solano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bankston et al v. ACE American Insurance Company et al
as 2:2013cv04783
Plaintiff:
Brigitte Bankston and Barry Bankston
Defendant:
Ace American Insurance Company, Greatwide Dallas Mavis, LLC and John Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Macias v. Greatwide Dallas Mavis, LLC et al
as 7:2013cv00291
Plaintiff:
Claudio Macias
Defendant:
Greatwide Dallas Mavis, LLC and Paul Tarkington
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 11707 Carmack Amendment
Pyramid Transportation Inc et al v. Greatwide Dallas Mavis LLC
as 3:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Pyramid Transportation Inc and Claudio Macias
Defendant:
Greatwide Dallas Mavis LLC
Counter_claimant:
Greatwide Dallas Mavis LLC
Counter_defendant:
Pyramid Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Stupp Bros Inc v. H.A. Logistics
as 2:2009cv07721
Plaintiff:
Stupp Bros Inc, Stupp Bros Inc, Indemnity Insurance Company of North America and others
Defendant:
H.A. Logistics, Inc. and H.A. Logistics, Inc.
Third Party Plaintiff:
H.A. Logistics, Inc. and H.A. Logistics, Inc.
Third Party Defendant:
Greatwide Dallas Mavis, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10743 Revised Interstate Commerce Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
