Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Harriman v. Brown & Root Industrial Services, LLC
as 3:2023cv01423
Plaintiff:
Joshua Harriman
Defendant:
Brown & Root Industrial Services, LLC
O'Malley v. Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.
as 5:2019cv00010
Defendant:
Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.
Plaintiff:
Claire O O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01021
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Palmaz Scientific, Inc. v. Harriman
as 5:2015cv00734
Movant:
Dr. Richard Benedikt and Alan Chesler
Defendant:
Susan E. Harriman
Plaintiff:
Palmaz Scientific, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Timothy Harriman v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 13-40717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY SCOTT HARRIMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, FRANK HOKE and JOHN BECRAFT
Harriman v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2013cv00357
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Harriman
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID, Frank Hoke and John Becraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harriman v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2013cv00225
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Harriman
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID, Frank Hoke and John Becraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Harriman v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-11266
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY SCOTT HARRIMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Timothy Harriman v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-10528
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY SCOTT HARRIMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
