Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Stringer v. Gram et al
as 3:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Charles Lavel Stringer
Defendant:
Chris Gram, Herb Frierson, Willie Mosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry Jr. v. Pearl River County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00402
Plaintiff:
James Curry and James Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Pearl River County Jail, Unknown Mataya, Sheria Davis and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Pearl River County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00403
Plaintiff:
Decorie Bates
Defendant:
Pearl River County Jail, Unknown Mataya, Sheria Davis and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keyes v. Pearl River County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
Harold David Keyes, Jr.
Defendant:
Pearl River County Jail, Host of Staff, Unknown Mataya and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRINGER v. DOWNY et al
as 3:2021cv00257
Defendant:
Jim Hood, UNKNOWN DRUG AGENT, Marshall Fisher and others
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Stringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00994
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Procter v. Host International, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00399
Plaintiff:
Procter and Ernetta Procter
Defendant:
HMSHost Corporation and Host International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Host v. USA
as 4:2015cv00137
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gregory Host
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moore v. Medical et al
as 4:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Decarlos Moore
Defendant:
Medical, Kirby Griffen, Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. EMCF Host Disciplinary et al
as 3:2014cv00604
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF Host Disciplinary, Unknown Dumas, Unknown Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
