Cases 1 - 10 of 56
W., a minor v. LivaNova USA, Inc.
as 4:2024cv02250
Plaintiff:
J. W., a minor
Defendant:
LivaNova USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Barlow v. Warden J. W. Cox
as 2:2022cv00161
Petitioner:
Kenneth A Barlow
Respondent:
Warden J. W. Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v Nueces County, Texas, et al.
as 2:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
guy Williams
Defendant:
Nueces County, Texas, Sheriff J. W. Hooper, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
J W et al v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
J W, Delonia Williams and Dulce Mendez
Defendant:
The United States of America, Baylor Scott & White Health, Hillcrest Baptist Medical Center doing business as Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Hillcrest and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00489
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
W. v. Katy Independant School District
as 4:2020cv00488
Defendant:
Katy Independant School District
Plaintiff:
Dr. J. W. and Alisha W.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Blacknall v. Lafavers et al
as 7:2018cv00111
Defendant:
R Gonzales, M Moberley and J W Lafavers
Plaintiff:
Brandon Blacknall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Lafavers et al
as 7:2018cv00112
Defendant:
R Gonzales, M Moberley and J W Lafavers
Plaintiff:
R James Johnson and Richard James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
