Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Collins v. Sanderson Farms, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00435
Defendant:
Sanderson Farms, Inc. and Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Production Division)
Plaintiff:
James Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Bryan Collins
as 20-10489
Defendant / Appellant:
BRYAN JAMES COLLINS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Demoll v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05572
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Collins Demoll, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Collins et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv02224
Plaintiff:
James Collins
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Savoy et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Co
as 6:2014cv02581
Plaintiff:
Ervin Savoy , Lillian Savoy , Arika A Thompson and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Cox et al
as 9:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
Rocky Williams
Defendant:
Brantley Cox and James Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albert Bell, Jr. v. Cody Ginsel, et al
as 12-41361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT BELL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GARRY B. GREGORY, CHRIS A. SIMMONS, L. MCCULLIM and others
Collins et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 3:2012cv03541
Plaintiff:
Barbara A Collins and James Collins
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collins v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2012cv01673
Petitioner:
Charlie James Collins, Jr
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collins v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2012cv00098
Petitioner:
Charlie James Collins, Jr
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
