Cases 1 - 10 of 884
Denelsbeck v. Ramirez et al
as 5:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
John Denelsbeck, III
Defendant:
Ricardo Ramirez, Jeremy J. Delacruz and Daniel Miranda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. Wellpath
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Burnett
Defendant:
Wellpath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wickman v. The State of Texas
as 3:2024cv01494
Petitioner:
Jeremy Wickman
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith v. Unknown Defendant 7:24-cv-90-O
as 7:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jace Smith
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant 7:24-cv-90-O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company v. CJI Piping and Fabrication, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
CJI Piping and Fabrication, LLC, Jeremy Hobson and Amy Abbott-Hobson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tamborello v. Town of Highland Park, Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01356
Plaintiff:
Sam C Tamborello
Defendant:
Town of Highland Park, Texas, William (Bill) Lindley, Tobin Maples and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wickman v. Navarro County Jail
as 3:2024cv01326
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wickman
Defendant:
Navarro County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salganik et al v. STATE OF TEXAS et al
as 6:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Kallan Salganik and $3,006.30 IN US CURRENCY, ET AL
Defendant:
STATE OF TEXAS, City of Waco, Chief Sheryl D. Victorian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Constitutional Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
