Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hobbs v. Stevens, et al
as 2:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Houston Hobbs
Defendant:
Angela K Stevens, John/Jane Doe 2, John/Jane Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
The Heidi Group, Inc. v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission et al
as 1:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
The Heidi Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Cecile Erwin Young, Office of the Inspector General of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
John & Jane Doe #1 et al v. Kipp, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv01179
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #4 (a/n/f E.S.), John & Jane Doe #1 (a/n/f J.P.), John & Jane Doe #3 (a/n/f A.G.C.) and others
Defendant:
Legacy Community Health Services, Inc., KIPP Texas, Inc., Kipp, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Reger v. Keller et al
as 1:2019cv00395
Defendant:
Attorney General Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., Presiding Judge Dean Rucker, Landon A. Wade and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Jay Reger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Ramirez v. John/Jane Doe #1, et al
as 18-20312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY JOHN RAMIREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN/JANE DOE #1, Chairperson, Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Classification and Records Office, JOHN/JANE DOE #2, Assistant Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Classification and Records Office, JOHN/JANE DOE #3, Intake Administrator, Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Classification and Records Office and others
Ramirez v. Doe #1 et al
as 4:2017cv02750
Plaintiff:
Rodney John Ramirez
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #1, John/Jane Doe #2, John/Jane Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Doe et al
as 3:2010cv00122
Plaintiff:
Martey Lee Vaughn
Defendant:
John Doe, John/Jane Doe #1, John/Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
