Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Doe v. City View Independent School District et al
as 7:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1 7:23-cv-32-O
Defendant:
City View Independent School District, Anthony Ray Bushong, Daryl Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Steele v. Holmes County Consolidated School District et al
as 3:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
Nikhal Steele
Defendant:
Holmes County Consolidated School District and John and Jane Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Pitchford v. Pebble Creek Apartments, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00728
Plaintiff:
Casshondra Pitchford
Defendant:
Pebble Creek Apartments, LLC and John and Jane Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Toney v. Select Specialty Hospital et al
as 3:2014cv00456
Plaintiff:
Annie Toney
Defendant:
Select Specialty Hospital , Select Specialty Hospital - Jackson, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Talon Transaction Technologies Inc et al v. StoneEagle Services Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00902
Plaintiff:
Talon Transaction Technologies Inc and NexPay Inc
Defendant:
StoneEagle Services Inc , VPay Inc , Robert Mark Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud & Abuse Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lawson v. Hinds County School District et al
as 3:2012cv00698
Plaintiff:
Richard G. Lawson
Defendant:
Hinds County School District and John and Jane Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Combat Zone Corp v. John/Jane Does 1-7
as 3:2012cv02550
Plaintiff:
Combat Zone Corp
Defendant:
John/Jane Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Lang v. Tauzin et al
as 3:2010cv00206
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Lang
Defendant:
Julie E. Tauzin and John/Jane Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
