Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Greene v. Kamara
as 2:2022cv04499
Plaintiff:
Darnell Greene, Jr.
Defendant:
Alvin Kamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Kamara v. Morgan Trucking & Transportation, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01539
Plaintiff:
Violet Kamara
Defendant:
Morgan Trucking & Transportation, LLC and Douglas Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Kamara v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00018
Petitioner:
Gilbrilla Kamara
Respondent:
Warden Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Volvo Financial Services v. Veen Logistics, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv01594
Defendant:
Veen Logistics, LLC and Hassanatu Kamara
Plaintiff:
Volvo Financial Services, A Division of VFS US LLC and Volvo Financial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Village Bank & Trust NA v. Clean Smiles Dental PLLC et al
as 3:2020cv03653
Defendant:
Clean Smiles Dental PLLC, Benbrook Family Dentistry PLLC and Harold Kamara
Plaintiff:
Village Bank & Trust NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zamanov v. KYZ Logistics, LLC et al
as 6:2020cv00711
Defendant:
Sedikie Kamara, KYZ Logistics, LLC and DOK Freight Systems, LLC
Plaintiff:
Niyaz Naib Zamanov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
USA v. Florence Kroma
as 16-41172
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FLORENCE B. KROMA, also known as Florence Kamara, also known as Florence Koroma, also known as Florence Bangura
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv02081
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1252
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
