Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Martinez, Jr v. Peterson et al
as 3:2022cv02471
Plaintiff:
Richard Martinez, Jr
Defendant:
Jeffrey Peterson, Church of Jesus Christ LDS and Taylor Tavita Koenig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
LD IP, LLC v. Ontel Products Corporation
as 2:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
LD IP, LLC
Defendant:
Ontel Products Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
LD Lift, Inc. dba Southtown 101 v. Northfield Insurance Company
as 5:2020cv00667
Defendant:
Northfield Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
LD Lift, Inc. and LD Lift, Inc. doing business as Southtown 101
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FILING ERROR
as 5:2020cv00666
Defendant:
Northfield Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
LD Lift, Inc., dba Southtown 101
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Madeleine Connor v. Leah Stewart, et al
as 20-50150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MADELEINE CONNOR
Defendant / Appellee:
LEAH STEWART, in her individual capacity as a LD Director, CHUCK MCCORMICK, in his individual capacity as a LD Director and ERIC CASTRO, in his individual capacity as a LD Director
Rabeiro v. LD Rodriguez Transport LLC
as 3:2020cv00462
Defendant:
LD RODRIGUEZ TRANSPORT LLC
Plaintiff:
BRIAN RABEIRO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Devabhaktuni v. Barton et al
as 3:2019cv03061
Defendant:
Dasha Barton, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, The Bridge and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devabhaktuni et al v. Barton et al
as 3:2019cv02845
Plaintiff:
Kushal Ravi, Trayee Ravi and Manogna Devabhaktuni
Defendant:
CPS, Mohan K Ravi, DFPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
