Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Escalante v. Hammel et al
as 3:2023cv01871
Plaintiff:
Leandro Escalante and Leandro Escalante, I
Defendant:
Preston Hammel, Nestor Munoz and City of Irving Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Burkhart v. University Interscholastic League (UIL) et al
as 1:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Jerry burkhart
Defendant:
University Interscholastic League (UIL), Michael motheral, Arturo Rodriguez Cavazos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Constitutional Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cordoves-Barrios v. Garland
as 21-60238
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Leandro Eladio Cordoves-Barrios
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rocky Orosco v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director
as 20-50512
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROCKY LEANDRO OROSCO
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv04943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03994
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
