Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Robert v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
Mark Robert
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C and Wal-Mart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hardesty v. Ta et al
as 9:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lenard Hardesty
Defendant:
Diane Ta, Mark Roberts, Donald Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grizzle v. Bell et al
as 9:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant:
Christopher Bell, Kurtis Tillis, Martha Walker and others
Amicus Curiae:
Attorney General of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Starkey v. Collier et al
as 9:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Brock Andrew Starkey
Respondent:
Mark Roberts and Tawona Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Martin
as 22-40206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dana Wayne Washington
Defendant / Appellee:
Stephen Martin, Dotun M. Fasan, Michael S. Brown and others
Grizzle v. Friederich et al
as 9:2021cv00295
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant:
J. Friederich, Quentin Tucker, Shantranethe Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starkey v. Collier
as 21-20083
Defendant / Appellee:
Khari Mott, Estelle Unit Medical Business Manager, Doctor Lannette Linthicum, Director of TDCJ Health Services Division, John Doe, University of Texas Medical Branch Correctional Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brock Andrew Starkey
Eldridge v. Collier et al
as 9:2020cv00229
Defendant:
Mark Roberts, Donald Muniz, Ernest A Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Ashford Eldridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevie Wyre v. UTMB, et al
as 20-40253
Defendant / Appellee:
OWEN J. MURRAY, JOSEPH M. BUSH, MARK ROBERTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVIE WYRE
Grizzle v. Coffman et al
as 9:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Bruce Johnson, Mervin Cleveland, Martha Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
