Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,492
Garza v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 7:2024cv00196
Plaintiff: Irma Gonzalez Garza
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01141
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01126
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Reed v. Marshall
as 24-20198
Plaintiff: Di Reed
Defendant: Joi Marshall, Tonya Harris, also known as Tonya Kelly and Myracle Holloway
Marshall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff: Kennardoa Abdyl Marshall
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: General Counsel SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ellis-Erkkila v. Manske
as 24-50329
Plaintiff: Priscilla Ann Ellis-Erkkila
Defendant: Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Manske, Magistrate Judge Gilliland, Administrative Courts Counsel and others
USA v. Marshall
as 24-50322
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Rogers Anthony Marshall
Sappington v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Petitioner: William C. Sappington
Respondent: United States Marshals Service, Memphis TN and Benton County, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00322
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cook v. Marshall
as 24-30222
Plaintiff: Stephen D. Cook, Doctor; In his capacity as Co-Trustee of Marshall Heritage Foundation
Defendant: Preston L. Marshall, In his capacity as Co-Trustee of Peroxisome Trust

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?