Cases 1 - 10 of 270
Mora v. Fuentes et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jesse Mora
Defendant:
Mary Fuentes, Adrian Munoz, Jerry Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Mora-Reyes
as 24-10078
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jesus Mora-Reyes
USA v. Ibarra-Mora
as 23-50880
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Miguel Angel Ibarra-Mora, also known as Miguel Angel Ibarra, also known as Miguel Angel Mora-Ibarra, also known as Miguel Angel Ramirez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mora v. Thor Motor Coach Inc et al
as 5:2023cv01557
Plaintiff:
Francisco J Mora
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc, Camping World R V Sales L L C and Bank of America N A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Mora v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00231
Petitioner:
Ramiro Alfredo Mora, III
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guerra v. Kroger Texas L.P. et al
as 4:2023cv03574
Plaintiff:
Rayko Mora Guerra
Defendant:
Kroger Texas L.P. and The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Martinez v. Guerra et al
as 7:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Pete Edwin Martinez
Defendant:
Eddie Guerra, Corporal Mora, Adan Guerrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mora v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
Ramiro Alfredo Mora, III
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
