Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hamilton v. Beaumont Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Hamilton
Defendant:
Beaumont Police Department, Jefferson County Sheriff Department and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Hamilton
Defendant:
State of Texas, Jefferson County Sheriff Department and Beaumont Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01307
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tunchez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DO NOT DOCKET IN 2:20-cv-129. DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE FILED IN 2:17-cr-648-1 .
as 2:2020cv00129
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Marcus Anthony Tunchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Garrett v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv11328
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Garrett
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Duffy-Thompson v. Collier et al
as 4:2018cv01919
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Duffy-Thompson
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Tony O'Hare, Roberto M Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Marcus Tunchez
as 18-40540
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCUS ANTHONY TUNCHEZ
USA v. Marcus Tunchez
as 18-40541
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCUS ANTHONY TUNCHEZ
USA v. Marcus Tunchez
as 18-40530
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCUS ANTHONY TUNCHEZ
Lopez v. Davis
as 6:2018cv00010
Petitioner:
Marcus Anthony Lopez
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
