Cases 1 - 6 of 6
State of Texas v. USA
as 23-40653
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy Miller, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Maria Rocha, Jose Magana-Salgado, Nanci J. Palacios Godinez and others
Intervenor:
State of New Jersey
State of Texas v. USA
as 21-40680
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy Miller, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Elizabeth Diaz, Jose Magana-Salgado, Karina Ruiz De Diaz and others
Intervenor:
State of New Jersey
Rocha v. Salazar et al
as 5:2021cv00839
Plaintiff:
Maria Rocha
Defendant:
Sheriff Javier Salazar, Bexar County Sheriff's Office, Unknown Officers Within BCSO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Rocha v US Bank, National Assocation
as 4:2021cv01584
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, National Assocation
Plaintiff:
Maria Rocha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
State of Texas et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00068
Defendant:
United States of America , Kirstjen M. Nielsen , Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Plaintiff:
State of Texas , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Karla Perez , Maria Rocha , Jose Magana-Salgado and others
Movant:
State of New Jersey
Amicu:
U.S. Rep. Steve King, et al.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Rocha et al v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's London et al; DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED.
as 4:2010cv02457
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Rocha and Maria Rocha
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's London , Affiliated Claims Service, Inc. and Clifton R Wooten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
