Cases 1 - 10 of 16
MT Leasing, LLC v. Stevens et al
as 5:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
MT Leasing, LLC
Defendant:
R. Michael Stevens and Nancy B Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA v. Smith
as 23-10303
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Steven Smith
Moates v. Biden et al
as 6:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Moates
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., State of Georgia, State of Louisiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Grayson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Ross
Defendant:
Grayson County Sheriff's Office, Grayson County Detention Center and Grayson County, TX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dougherty v. BSI Financial Services, Inc et al
as 4:2021cv02186
Plaintiff:
Jzavela-Arethea Dougherty
Defendant:
BSI Financial Services, Inc. and Michael Steven Dougherty
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Smith v. P & B Intermodal Services LLC
as 3:2020cv03618
Defendant:
P & B Intermodal Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith, Michael Steven Smith, Wayne Boyd and others
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jenkins v. Oak Lodge, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01673
Plaintiff:
Madeline Jenkins
Defendant:
Oak Lodge, LLC, Parc 73, LLC and Michael Stevens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stevens v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv04917
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Steven Arreola
as 17-50055
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVEN MICHAEL ARREOLA, also known as Michael Steven Arreola
Mena v. USA
as 1:2016cv00110
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Steven Mena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
