Cases 1 - 10 of 1,869
United States of America v. Phillips
as 4:2024cv02306
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Chester Phillips
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
Velazquez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00142
Petitioner:
Phillip Marcelino Velazquez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dingle v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Marthur L Dingle
Defendant:
Phillip C Smith, Jr, Raquel West and Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amazon.com Inc et al v. Baik et al
as 3:2024cv01483
Petitioner:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Respondent:
Justin Baik, Kathleen Freeman, Ashley Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Fischer v. Dinges et al
as 4:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Leon A. Fischer
Defendant:
Dan O. Dinges, Scott C. Schroeder, Phillip L. Stalnaker and others
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 4:2024cv02142
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Ms. FNU Mosley, F/N/U Akinroabu, Sgt. Camille Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Molineaux v. V.A. Conroe Outpatient Clinic
as 4:2024cv02095
Plaintiff:
Phillip G Molineaux
Defendant:
V.A. Conroe Outpatient Clinic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Winder et al v. United States
as 7:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Latrisha Winder, Lily Winder, Stephen Tyler Winder and others
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Vasek v. Barnett et al
as 6:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
James L. Vasek
Defendant:
Dolores June Barnett, Jeffrey Sharp, Thomas Phillip Eitel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
