Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Smith et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jessica Smith, Joel Wallskog, M.D., Theodore Cabaniss, on behalf of his minor son, T.C. and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States Health Resources and Services Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
State of Texas v. Biden
as 23-10143
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas and State of Missouri
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security and others
State of Missouri v. Biden
as 22-40526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Missouri and State of Texas
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Rollins v. President
as 22-20360
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Randall E. Rollins and Randall E. Rollins, and does 1-300,000,000
Defendant / Appellee:
The President of The United States of America, The Senate of the United States of America and The House of Representatives of the United States of America
Cowan v. Biden
as 22-10605
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Felix Lyle Cowan
Defendant / Appellee:
Joe Biden, President of the United States of America, Clarence Thomas, United States Supreme Court, Special Justice and Sheila Jackson Lee, United States Representatives (Houston)
U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26 v. Biden
as 22-10597
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26, U.S. Navy Special Warfare Combatant Craft Crewmen 1-5, U.S. Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technician 1 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Lloyd Austin, Secretary, U.S. Department of Defense, In his official capacity as United States Secretary of Defense, United States Department of Defense and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Major Michael Webb
U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26 v. Biden
as 22-10534
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26, U.S. Navy Special Warfare Combatant Craft Crewmen 1-5, U.S. Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technician 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Lloyd Austin, Secretary, U.S. Department of Defense, In his official capacity as United States Secretary of Defense, United States Department of Defense and others
Rollins v. The President of The United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv01427
Plaintiff:
Randall E Rollins
Defendant:
The President of The United States of America, The Senate of the United States of America and The House of Representatives of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
State of Missouri v. Biden
as 22-40110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Missouri and State of Texas
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security and others
U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26 v. Biden
as 22-10077
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26, U.S. Navy Special Warfare Combatant Craft Crewmen 1-5, U.S. Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technician 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Lloyd Austin, Secretary, U.S. Department of Defense, individually and in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Defense, United States Department of Defense and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
