Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Oliver v. Sims et al
as 4:2020cv02660
Defendant:
Justin C Opara, Shanay Sims, Danielle Y Wilcox and others
Plaintiff:
Taamili Samba Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennemer v. Danzy et al
as 3:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Justin C Opara, Adam M Gonzales, Kurtis D Pharr and others
Plaintiff:
John David Kennemer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00289
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 - Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Reynolds v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC, et al
as 2:2015cv07066
Plaintiff:
Laurice R Reynolds
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho, LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare Pharmceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. REYNOLDS RADIO, INC. d/b/a KAZE-FM et al
as 6:2012cv00256
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , AMAZEMENT MUSIC , BEEN JAMMIN MUSIC and others
Defendant:
REYNOLDS RADIO, INC. d/b/a KAZE-FM and KENNETH R REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hagen et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP
as 3:2010cv01625
Plaintiff:
Robert S Hagen and R R Reynolds
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reynolds v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation
as 2:2010cv00152
Plaintiff:
James R Reynolds
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
