Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Thompson v. The Shaw Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00708
Plaintiff:
Zid R. Thompson
Defendant:
The Shaw Group, Inc. , Shaw, Stone & Webster International, LLC , Stone & Webster Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Thompson v. The Shaw Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv00167
Plaintiff:
Zid R. Thompson
Defendant:
The Shaw Group, Inc. , Shaw, Stone & Webster International, LLC , Stone & Webster Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Thompson et al v. CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00190
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Thompson , Robert P. Thompson , Robyn R. Thompson and others
Defendant:
CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ashley et al v. Allen Camper Manufacturing Company et al.
as 1:2009cv00831
Plaintiff:
Joyce T. Ashley, Charles L. Ashley, All Plaintiffs and others
Defendant:
Allen Camper Manufacturing Company, Inc., Alliance Homes, Inc., American Camper Manufacturing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clay v. Epps et al
as 3:2009cv00318
Plaintiff:
Louis J. Clay
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Moncree Allen, Mary R. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chayer v. Barbour et al
as 3:2007cv00622
Plaintiff:
Stephen Chayer, Stephen Chayer, Stephen Chayer and others
Defendant:
Haley Barbour, Donald Taylor, Walley Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
