Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 21-10976
Petitioner / Appellant:
C. Raymond Jones, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
USA v. Jones
as 21-10916
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Roderick Raymond Jones, also known as Rooster
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2021cv01445
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
C Raymond Jones, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jones v. Wright National Flood Insurance Services, LLC
as 3:2017cv01049
Plaintiff:
Raymond Jones
Defendant:
Wright National Flood Insurance Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
Jones v. Janssen Research & Development LLC f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv14597
Plaintiff:
Raymond Jones
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Granger et al v. National Football League et al
as 2:2012cv01303
Plaintiff:
Charlie Granger , Barbara Granger , Allen Dunbar and others
Defendant:
National Football League, Riddell, Inc, Riddell Sports Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc.
as 2:2009cv05765
Plaintiff:
Raymond Jones, Sr., Raymond Jones, Sr., Tressie Easter and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Castro, et al
as 08-50168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLEOTIS RAYMOND JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
R CASTRO, Warden, J GARCIA, Captain, P CORTEZ, Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
