Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Roach et al v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Charles Roach and Anna Roach
Defendant:
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Roach v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Roach, Jr.
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc., BP America Production Company, Transocean Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1349
Kinnel v. Tunica County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00247
Defendant:
Tunica County, Mississippi, Sheriff K. C. Hamp, Jailer Sharon Hargrow and others
Plaintiff:
Tanyatta Kinnel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. Krishnakrupa of America, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00448
Defendant:
Krishnakrupa of America, LLC, John Does 1-10 and XYZ Corporations 1-10
Plaintiff:
Patricia Roach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00124
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Payton v. Roach
as 2:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Robert Dewayne Payton
Defendant:
Thomas Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. GEICO Insurance Company et al
as 3:2016cv00684
Plaintiff:
Jaime Roach
Defendant:
GEICO Insurance Company , Kim Tuggle , ABC Corp and XYZ Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hood v. Cannon et al
as 3:2015cv00317
Plaintiff:
Jim Hood
Defendant:
Fred Cannon , Christopher Artzer , Andre Ditsch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Goldmon v. Epps et al
as 4:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
Antonio Goldmon
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lee, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yankton v. Epps et al
as 4:2014cv00034
Plaintiff:
LaVan Yankton, Sr.
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
