Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Pastor (Kramer) v. Madrigal et al
as 5:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Adriana Pastor (Kramer)
Defendant:
Leonardo Madrigal, Pedro Patron, Aldo Shiavon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Tejeda v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv01009
Petitioner:
Rudy Tejeda, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America and Freddy Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Tejeda v. Warden, FMC Fort Worth
as 5:2023cv01226
Petitioner:
Rudy Tejeda, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FMC Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Do v. Narvaez, et al
as 1:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Quan Anh Do
Defendant:
G.W. Trucking Inc., GW Materials, Inc., GW Trucking Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Tejeda v. Dixon et al
as 2:2022cv02758
Plaintiff:
Edgar Tejada and Edgar Tejeda
Defendant:
Jonathan Dixon and Sentry Select Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Tejeda Herrera v. Garland
as 22-60200
Petitioner:
Salvador Tejeda Herrera
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Tejeda v. Johnson & Johnson Services Inc et al
as 3:2021cv02825
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Digna Tejeda
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, Johnson & Johnson Inc and DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castillo et al v. Monterrosa et al
as 3:2021cv01966
Plaintiff:
Maria M Castillo and Alexander G Soto
Defendant:
Gizzel B Monterrosa, Jose L Tejeda and Gizzel B Monterrosa doing business as GLD Transport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
USA v. Tejada-Aria
as 21-40429
Defendant / Appellant:
Edwin Orlando Tejada-Aria, also known as Edwin Orlando Tejeda-Aria
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
USA v. Limon-Tejeda
as 21-50008
Defendant / Appellant:
Juan Jose Limon-Tejeda
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
