Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 701
U.S. Attorney's Office, Western District of Texas v. $63,760.00, More or Less, in United States Currency
as 5:2021cv00066
Respondent:
$63,760.00, More or Less, in United States Currency
Petitioner:
U.S. Attorney's Office, Western District of Texas and U.S. Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00099
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
United States of America v. $36,376.00, More of Less, In United States Currency Seized On Or About December 20, 2019, In San Antonio, Texas
as 5:2020cv00844
Plaintiff:
U.S. Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5332
Nielsen v. Saul
as 4:2019cv04825
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and U.S. Attorneys Office
Plaintiff:
Carol Nielsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dark v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv03104
Plaintiff:
Brian Dark
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Holt v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv01894
Plaintiff:
Michael Holt
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill, US Attorney General and U.S. Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barnes v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00952
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Other Undisclosed BODA Attorneys, Russell Travis and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demers-Sborov v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv04012
Plaintiff:
Cornelia Demers-Sborov
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorneys Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Currie v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv03031
Plaintiff:
Dina Currie
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill, US Attorney General and U.S. Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
