Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bearden v. United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service et al
as 3:2023cv01204
Plaintiff:
Theresa Bearden
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service and USDA Rural Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Cyclone Assets BMO Harris v. Darrell Lee Close et al
as 2:2022cv00947
Plaintiff:
Cyclone Assets BMO Harris and Cyclone Assets BMO Harris doing business as Cyclone Assets
Defendant:
Estate of Darrell Lee Close, Barbara Klein Close, Barbara Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Williams v. Lambright et al
as 4:2019cv00342
Defendant:
USDA, USDA Rural Development, United States of America Department of Agriculture and others
Plaintiff:
Hazel Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Julius Tolbert v. USDA Rural Development, et al
as 15-50676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIUS C. TOLBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
USDA RURAL DEVELOPMENT, JIMMIE J. KOLODIZE, Area Specialist, SALLY LOSKOWSKI, Assist Area Specialist and others
Tolbert v. USDA Rural Development et al
as 1:2015cv00144
Defendant:
Joyce Allen, Leslie Bradly, Mark J. Brezina and others
Plaintiff:
Julius C. Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Edwards et al v. USDA Rural Development
as 1:2010cv00605
Plaintiff:
Roger Edwards and Cheryl Trahan Edwards
Defendant:
USDA Rural Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Pinecrest Apartments, LLC. et al
as 1:2009cv00632
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Pinecrest Apartments, LLC., USDA Rural Development and Pinecrest Waveland, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Thompson et al v. USDA Rural Development
as 3:2007cv01716
Plaintiff:
Tony Thompson and Natalie Blacks
Defendant:
USDA Rural Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409 (a) Quiet Title Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
