Cases 1 - 10 of 193
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01060
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cook v. Securus Tech Corporation et al
as 6:2024cv00479
Defendant:
Securus Tech Corporation, Hughes Prison, Officer FNU Ponce and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parsons v. All Mailroom Staffing et al
as 6:2024cv00480
Defendant:
All Mailroom Staffing, All Waco Postmasters and Employees, All STG Employees and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Parsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Summers v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00294
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Petitioner:
Michael S Summers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Miller v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00267
Petitioner:
Robert Ethan Miller
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Petty v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00249
Petitioner:
Stanley Lanech Petty, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Duran v. The United States Attorney General et al
as 3:2024cv01518
Defendant:
USAG, USPS OIG, USPS PMG and others
Plaintiff:
Amy C Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02233
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
De Mandueno Garcia v. USP Victorville
as 4:2024cv00454
Petitioner:
Felipe De Mandueno Garcia and Carlos Jesus Madueno
Respondent:
USP Victorville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Quezada v. USP Tucson
as 5:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Graciano Pina Quezada
Defendant:
USP Tucson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
