Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Sledge v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv03485
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Veronique Sledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Veronique Allen
as 17-30003
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
VERONIQUE ALLEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Green et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00196
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Green , Alexis Bradley , Leonard Bradley and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00481
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Green , All Plaintiffs , Alexis Bradley and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Bechtel International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee et al v. McVaugh et al
as 4:2011cv01452
Plaintiff:
Veronique Gregory Michelle Lee and Kathy Lee
Defendant:
Mr McVaugh, Pam McVaugh, Gerri Larsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee et al v. McVaugh
as 4:2011mc00164
Plaintiff:
Veronique Gregory Michelle Lee and Kathy Lee
Defendant:
McVaugh Custom Homes, Mr McVaugh, Pam McVaugh and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv01368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gregory v. Hudson et al
as 4:2011mc00141
Petitioner:
Veronique M Gregory
Respondent:
Karen Jackson Hudson and Savera Jackson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
