Cases 11 - 20 of 466
Jonathon Edick v. Michael Burgess
as 24-1109
Petitioner:
JONATHON EDICK and JONATHON LOYD EDICK
Respondent:
MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden, identified on initiating document as People of the State of Michigan
Michigan Depart of Envt, Great Lakes and Energy, et al v. Gerald R. Ford International Airport Authority
as 24-1085
Plaintiff:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, GREAT LAKES AND ENERGY, on behalf of the People of the State of Michigan and DANA NESSEL, Attorney General, on behalf of the People of the State of Michigan
Defendant:
GERALD R. FORD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY
Owen Barnaby v. MI, et al
as 24-1086
Plaintiff:
OWEN W. BARNABY
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM, Former Governor and others
Robert Cornett v. MI, et al
as 23-2037
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES CORNETT
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and JOHN DOE, All parties from case number 239003227PH 55th District Court; M220348GC 96th District Court; 231443AGC 80th District Court
Boston Tompkins v. Unknown Part(y)(ies), et al
as 23-1989
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOSTON JERMAINE TOMPKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Employees of the State of Michigan Department of Corrections, WARDEN MICHAEL BURGESS, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR T. BASSETT and others
USA v. MI
as 23-1971
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor:
BAY MILLS INDIAN COMMUNITY, SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS, GRAND TRAVERSE BAND OF OTTAWA AND CHIPPEWA INDIANS and others
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, and its agents
Not Yet Classified:
COALITION TO PROTECT MICHIGAN RESOURCES, fka Michigan Fisheries Resources Conservation Coalition
Daretha Braziel, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 23-1954
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DARETHA BRAZIEL, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan, next friend of RB, next friend of DB, next friend of DR, KEESHA JONES, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan, next friend of KJ, next friend of DJ, next friend of TC, next friend of KB, IEASHA JONES, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan and others
Defendant:
GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, iindividually and in her official capacity, STATE OF MICHIGAN, Environment, Great Lakes & Energy, LIESL CLARK, Director, individually and in her official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCUS MUHAMMAD, Mayor, individually and in his official capacity, MICHAEL O'MALLEY, Water Plant Operator, individually and in his official capacity and CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, MI, a Municipal Corporation, through the Benton Harbor Water Department
USA v. MI
as 23-1944
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor / Appellee:
BAY MILLS INDIAN COMMUNITY, SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS, GRAND TRAVERSE BAND OF OTTAWA AND CHIPPEWA INDIANS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, and its agents
Amicus Curiae:
COALITION TO PROTECT MICHIGAN RESOURCES, fka Michigan Fisheries Resources Conservation Coalition
USA v. MI
as 23-1931
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor / Appellee:
BAY MILLS INDIAN COMMUNITY, GRAND TRAVERSE BAND OF OTTAWA AND CHIPPEWA INDIANS, LITTLE RIVER BAND OF OTTAWA INDIANS and others
Intervenor:
SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, and its agents
Kirk Jensen v. Unknown Parties #1, et al
as 23-1859
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIRK EDWIN JENSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTIES #1, named as all variations of the person Sheriff's Department, UNKNOWN PARTIES #2, named as a Department of County of St. Joseph D-U-N-S number: 008645009, UNKNOWN PARTIES #3, named as all variations of the person St. Joseph County Court and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
