Cases 81 - 90 of 145
In re: Facebook, Inc., IPO Securities and Derivative Litigation
as 1:2012md02389
Petitioner:
William H. Anhood, A. Marcus Gerber, Eric Rand and others
Defendant:
Raymond James & Associates, Inc., David A. Ebersman, Muriel Siebert & Co., Inc. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Faisal Sami, Colin Suzman, Steve Jarvis and others
Plaintiff:
Sanjay Israni, Nuhket Kayahan, Elbita Alfonso and others
Lead Plaintiff:
Banyan Capital Master Fund Ltd., Fresno County Employees' Retirement Association, Institutional Investor Group and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
David Ebersman
Interested Party:
Nasdaq claimant group
Not Classified By Court:
James J. Hayes
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Jerry Rayburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Nisser v. New York Stock Exchange et al
as 1:2012cv07471
Plaintiff:
Glenk Nisser
Defendant:
New York Stock Exchange, Euronext, European and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eagan v. Nasdaqomx Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06882
Plaintiff:
David Eagan
Defendant:
Nasdaqomx Group, Inc. and The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Zack v. The Nasdaq Group Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06439
Plaintiff:
Michael Zack
Defendant:
The Nasdaq Group Inc. and The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Gura et al v. The Nasdaq OMX Group, Inc.
as 1:2012cv05930
Plaintiff:
Philip S. Gura and Marion Gura
Defendant:
The Nasdaq OMX Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
First New York Securities LLC et al v. Nasdaq OMX Group Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05630
Plaintiff:
First New York Securities LLC , T3 Trading Group LLC and Avatar Securities LLC
Defendant:
Nasdaq OMX Group Inc. and The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
