Cases 31 - 40 of 2,809
Elliott v. Rowan County Schools Board of Education et al
as 0:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
John Elliott
Defendant:
Rowan County Schools Board of Education and Michael Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kallmeyer v. Mathews
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alexander Kallmeyer
Defendant:
Samuel Mathews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rogers v. Blakeman
as 5:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Steven Rogers
Defendant:
Gina Blakeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Holliman v. Stanton et al
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
David Holliman
Defendant:
Steve Stanton, Stanton Homes, LLC. and Zachary Stayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Walker et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Terrence Walker and Amber Bishop
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, City of Harrodsburg, Kentucky and J.D. Pal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
