Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Matthews v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Louis R. Matthews
Defendant:
USP McCreary, Colette Peters, John Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Walker et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Terrence Walker and Amber Bishop
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, City of Harrodsburg, Kentucky and J.D. Pal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Workman et al v. Kelly et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Scott Workman and Scott's Garage, LLC
Defendant:
Joshua L. Kelly, Matthew Hutti, Eric Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Warden Roby L.L.C.C.
as 2:2023cv00174
Petitioner:
Darrin Walker
Respondent:
Warden Roby L.L.C.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fugate v. Fayette County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Fugate
Defendant:
Fayette County Detention Center, CO Walker and CO Emme
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00077
Petitioner:
Timothy Walker
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oldson v. Burnett et al
as 3:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Christopher Oldson
Defendant:
Col. Phillip Burnett, Jr., Lt. Col. Michael Rogers, Major Darren Stapleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker-Jones v. Zips Car Wash, LLC
as 5:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Shirley Walker-Jones
Defendant:
Zips Car Wash, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Walker v. SSA
as 6:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Allison Neace Walker
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Walker v. Rose
as 7:2022cv00105
Petitioner:
Lamont Walker
Respondent:
D. Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
