Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Cases 41 - 50 of 7,045
Bennett v. USA
as 2:2024cv10364
Petitioner: Christopher D. Bennett
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Elmoqaddem v. California, State of et al
as 2:2024cv10334
Plaintiff: Sam Salaheddine Elmoqaddem
Defendant: California, State of, Vincent Zurzolo, Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and others
Scott v. USA
as 2:2024cv10392
Petitioner: Terry L. Scott, Jr.
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robinson v. USA
as 2:2024cv10304
Petitioner: Olee Wonzo Robinson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ravula et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv10272
Plaintiff: Srihari Ravula and Deepa Irri
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Valade v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv10175
Plaintiff: Estate of Gretchen C. Valade
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Moore v. USA
as 2:2024cv10019
Petitioner: Tyrone Dashawn Moore
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Franks v. USA
as 2:2024cv10027
Petitioner: Richard Anthony Franks
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Furlong v. USA
as 2:2023cv13277
Petitioner: Michael James Furlong
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Olaya v. USA
as 2:2023cv13240
Petitioner: Juan Olaya
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?