Cases 121 - 130 of 846,860
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10357
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv10364
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
GLENN LONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BOATWRIGHT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv10374
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
CHANTE BOATWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Oakley v. Keaton
as 1:2024mc00518
Plaintiff:
Charles Oakley
Defendant:
Kori Keaton
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07773
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Balser v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 3:2024cv01944
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Balser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01948
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
HIRSHEY et al v. ENCOMPASS HOME AND AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv05960
Plaintiff:
JULIE HIRSHEY and JOSHUA HIRSHEY
Defendant:
ENCOMPASS HOME AND AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
BINSON v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv05956
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION and EXCEL ELEVATOR & ESCALATOR CORP.
Plaintiff:
KENNESHA BINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MCINTOSH v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv05966
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
JACK MCINTOSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
