Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Rogers-Reed et al. v. Peterson et al.
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Keon A. Rogers-Reed and Cornelious L. Reed
Defendant:
Felisity Claudia Peterson, Rustler Sales & Service LLC, John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Reo v. Reynaud et al
as 1:2022cv00510
Plaintiff:
Bryan Anthony Reo
Defendant:
Ludivine Joan Claudia Reynaud and Dominique Bilde
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hoerig v. Smith
as 4:2022cv00300
Petitioner:
Claudia C. Hoerig
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Vercellotti v. Energizer Auto Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Lifeworks Technologis, Meijer Stores, John Doe 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Claudia Vercellotti and Claudia Y. Vercellotti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dorsey, Jr. v. Murphy et al
as 3:2020cv02679
Defendant:
Belal A. Tawil, Officer L. Nitkiewicz, Officer Paul Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Rooseveltt Dorsey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00552
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald's Corporation et al v. Titus et al
as 3:2020cv00035
Defendant:
Claudia Titus and Richard Strahm
Plaintiff:
McDonald's Corporation and McDonald's Real Estate Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilton v. United States of America et al
as 5:2019cv00133
Plaintiff:
Sharla Wilton
Defendant:
State of Ohio and United States of America
Petitioner:
Rebecca S. Pierson, Robin Rae Kelly, Jacqueline A. Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
