Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Hadnot v. Farrow et al
as 3:2018cv00248
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hadnot
Defendant:
Eric Farrow, Jane Doe, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Knox County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2018cv00157
Plaintiff:
Jared Stephens
Defendant:
Knox County Sheriff's Office, Anthony McGaha, Marcus R. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Watson et al
as 1:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cox
Defendant:
Eric Watson, John Beavers, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Phillips et al
as 3:2017cv00537
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dunn
Defendant:
Shawn Phillips, Tony Parker, f/n/u Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parham v. Hammond et al
as 1:2017cv00318
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Parham
Defendant:
Jim Hammond , Zachary Casteel , Jacob Goforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey et al v. Knox County Tennessee et al
as 3:2017cv00477
Plaintiff:
Kenny Bailey and Tina Bailey
Defendant:
Knox County Tennessee, Knox County Sheriff's Office, J. J. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2017cv00297
Petitioner:
Reginald Charles Harvey
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Mark Bender, P Ego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehead et al v. Washington County et al
as 2:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Tatia Dovie Whitehead and Eric Grant Whitehead
Defendant:
Washington County, Ed Graybeal, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe #1 et al v. Sevier County, Tennessee et al (RLJ2)
as 3:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Defendant:
Sevier County, Tennessee , Sevier County Board of Education and Jack Parton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv00460
Plaintiff:
Carl Hamilton
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Centurion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
