Cases 1 - 10 of 25,833
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Amazon.Com, Inc. et al v. Rudd
as 2:2024cv02410
Petitioner:
Amazon.Com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Respondent:
Nikenya Rudd
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Ford v. Fayette County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02405
Plaintiff:
Dr. fabre ford
Defendant:
Fayette County, Tennessee, Sheriff Bobby Riles, matthew salamon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Collins v. Bledsoe County Correctional Complex et al
as 2:2024cv02408
Plaintiff:
Terrance T. Collins
Defendant:
Bledsoe County Correctional Complex, Lt. Breeding, Sgt. Overholt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2024cv02407
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rugs America Corp. v. Kirkland's Inc.
as 2:2024cv02397
Plaintiff:
Rugs America Corp.
Defendant:
Kirkland's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Newsom v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 2:2024cv02401
Not Yet Classified:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Shirley Newsom
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Woodard v. Becton, Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv02398
Plaintiff:
Lisa Woodard and Lisa Faust-Woodard
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Defendant:
Becton, Dickinson and Company, C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Access Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rudd v. Samuel
as 2:2024cv02400
Not Yet Classified:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Latanua K. Rudd
Defendant:
Mays H. Samuel, JR., State of Tennessee and Tennessee Bar Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
