Cases 11 - 20 of 262
Cook et al v. Lake Michigan Credit Union
as 2:2022cv12074
Plaintiff:
Brad Cook, Hannah Ritzenhein and Jenna Mitchell
Defendant:
Lake Michigan Credit Union
Marshall Lloyd, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 22-1245
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FORD MOTOR COMPANY F-150 AND RANGER TRUCK FUEL ECONOMY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL B. LLOYD, DUSTIN DAWSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RICK SHAWLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Mitton et al v. Christian Insurance Group, et al
as 1:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Amber Mitton, Shani Rasor, Cameron Cook and others
Defendant:
Christian Insurance Group, d/b/a Christian Financial, Jacob Hagg, Noah Bushnell and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Bradley-Young et al
as 3:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Farrah Bradley-Young individually, and doing business as Carol Ann's Home Cooking Cafe, Chris McGlown individually, and doing business as Carol Ann's Home Cooking Cafe and Carol Ann's Home Cooking Cafe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 Communications Act of 1934
USA v. Timothy Cook
as 22-5078
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY COOK
USA v. William Cook, III
as 22-3060
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM H. COOK, III
USA v. Gregory Cook
as 22-5056
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY ALLEN COOK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Seanderyl Crawford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-1734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEANDERYL CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
