Civil Rights Cases filed in Michigan
Cases 61 - 70 of 18,654
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11286
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11294
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Jakubowski v. Schoolcraft, County of et al
as 2:2024cv00080
Plaintiff: Michael John Jakubowski, Jr.
Defendant: Schoolcraft, County of and Michigan, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11280
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Zellers v. Fifth 3rd Bank
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff: Gregory Dean Zellers, Jr.
Defendant: Fifth 3rd Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv11264
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11258
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Barfell v. Driveline Retail Merchandising et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00495
Plaintiff: Thomas H.L. Barfell
Defendant: Driveline Retail Merchandising, Trion Solutions Inc., Heather Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American With Disabilities Act- Discrimination
Laukka et al v. Ontonagon County et al
as 2:2024cv00075
Plaintiff: Michael Laukka and Heidi Wettberg
Defendant: Ontonagon County and Michele Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?