Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Matthews et al v. Crown Defense Ltd., Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv11022
Plaintiff:
Robert Matthews and Brenda Matthews
Defendant:
Crown Defense Ltd., Inc., Jon Marshall and Juan Hueck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Rayner-Altenbernd v. Gilbert et al
as 1:2023cv11207
Plaintiff:
Michele Rayner-Altenbernd
Defendant:
Daniel Gilbert, Jay Farner, Jennifer Gilbert and others
Hebig v. Lebovitz et al (JRG2)
as 1:2020cv00097
Defendant:
Stephen D. Lebovitz, Richard J. Lieb, Augustus N. Stephas and others
Plaintiff:
david p hebig
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Kemmer v. Lebovitz et al (JRG3)
as 1:2020cv00052
Defendant:
Gary L. Bryenton, Augustus N. Stephas, Richard J. Lieb and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre Kemmer
Shebitz v. Lebovitz et al. (JRG3)
as 1:2019cv00213
Defendant:
Stephen D. Lebovitz, Gary J. Nay, John D. Griffith and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Shebitz
Scarantino v. Fairmount Santrol Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01047
Plaintiff:
Richard Scarantino
Defendant:
Fairmount Santrol Holdings, Inc., William E Conway, Jennifer D. Deckard and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Gallagher v. Advancepierre Foods Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00356
Plaintiff:
Brian Gallagher
Defendant:
Advancepierre Foods Holdings, Inc., Dean Hollis, Christopher D Sliva and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Parshall v. Advancepierre Foods Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00333
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
Advancepierre Foods Holdings, Inc., Dean Hollis, Celeste A Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
v. Bushansky et al
as 1:2017cv00325
Defendant:
Stephen Bushansky, Advancepierre Foods, Inc., John N Simons, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
v. Bushansky et al
as 1:2017oe00325
Defendant:
Stephen Bushansky, Advancepierre Foods, Inc., John N Simons, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
