Cases 161 - 170 of 583
Consumers Energy Company v. Adrian & Blissfield Rail Road Company et al
as 2:2016cv12938
Defendant:
Adrian & Blissfield Rail Road Company , Adrian, City of, Michigan Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff:
Consumers Energy Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Highlands One, LLC v. Indiana & Ohio Railway Company et al
as 1:2016cv00763
Plaintiff:
Highlands One, LLC
Defendant:
Indiana & Ohio Railway Company , Warren County Treasurer and Warren County Auditor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over Three Strips of Land, Each 200 Feet Wide, and 1271 Feet, 378.9 Feet, and 1403.5 Feed Long, Respectively all in Crockett County, Tennessee et al
as 1:1967cv01780
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way over Three Strips of Land, Each 200 Feet Wide, and 1271 Feet, 378.9 Feet, and 1403.5 Feet Long, Respectively all in Crockett County, Tennessee, Nellie P. Pugh, Luna K. McKnight and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258
Geldys v. Dearborn Heights, City of
as 2:2016cv11729
Plaintiff:
Gediminas J. Geldys
Defendant:
Dearborn Heights, City of
City of Florence, Kentucky v. S & J Hospitality Group, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00060
Plaintiff:
City of Florence, Kentucky
Defendant:
S & J Hospitality Group, LLC , Sridhar Kadaba , Keybank National Association and others
Cross_claimant:
The Tax Lien Service Corporation
Cross_defendant:
The Tax Lien Service Corporation
Counter_claimant:
The Tax Lien Service Corporation
Counter_defendant:
S & J Hospitality Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Easements and Rights-of-Way over a Total of 16.95 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Van Buren County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2016cv00026
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
Easements and Rights-of-Way over a Total of 16.95 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Van Buren County, Tennessee, Cunningham Properties, LLC and The Land Trust for Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Easements and Rights-of-Way over a Total of 3.52 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Van Buren County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2016cv00027
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
Easements and Rights-of-Way over a Total of 3.52 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Van Buren County, Tennessee, Polia A. Davis, Ruth Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way Over 0.56 Acre of Land, More or Less, in Van Buren County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2016cv00025
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way Over 0.56 Acre of Land, More or Less, in Van Buren County, Tennessee and Melissa C. Rogers
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. .62 Acres of Land, More or Less In Lawrence County, Ohio et al
as 1:2016cv00330
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
.62 Acres of Land, More or Less In Lawrence County, Ohio , .59 Acres of Land, More or Less , .56 Acres of Land, More or Less and others
Claimant:
David Lester , Linda Lester , Jack Whaley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Equitrans, L.P. v. 0.05 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Monroe County, Ohio Hannibal Development, LLC DBA Hannibal Development Partners, LLC
as 2:2016cv00053
Plaintiff:
Equitrans, L.P.
Defendant:
0.05 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Monroe County, Ohio Hannibal Development, LLC DBA Hannibal Development Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
