Cases 1 - 10 of 434
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Noble et al
as 1:2022cv00714
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Georgia Noble, John Doe and Nikole Charmaine Hatton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Heather Harris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
as 22-5911
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEATHER HOGROBROOKS HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and WILSON & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Collins et al
as 1:2022cv01821
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Virgil H. Collins, Ruth J. Collins, New Century Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Courtney Selmon-Austin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
as 22-5873
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COURTNEY ANTROYNESE SELMON-AUSTIN, Su Jiris, En Proprio Persona
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and WILSON & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
JACKSON v. WELLS FARGO, N.A., et al
as 2:2021cv12981
Plaintiff:
LENNIE JACKSON
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO, N.A., Trustee Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of May 1, 2005 Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2005-WHQ3 and JELOD INVESTMENT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Selmon-Austin v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 2:2021cv02724
Plaintiff:
Courtney-Antroynese Selmon-Austin
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank and Wilson & Associates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kim v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2021cv02621
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk W. Aaron Hall
Plaintiff:
Scott Kim
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wilson & Associates, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2021cv02558
Plaintiff:
Heather Hogrobrooks Harris
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wilson & Associates, P.L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Perry v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 3:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Bryan M. Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
