Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Materna v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02224
Defendant:
JOHN DOE-1 and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Claire Materna
Undetermined:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Mason et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-10, John 1-10 Does, Gary J Bergenske and others
Plaintiff:
F Harrison Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richardson et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation, et al
as 1:2018cv01308
Plaintiff:
James R. Richardson, M.D. and Mansfield Internal Medicine, Inc.
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation , David C. Kelsey, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
La Rosa v. Allen et al
as 1:2018cv00095
Plaintiff:
Massimo La Rosa
Defendant:
Jonathan Allen , Abbie Conant and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Obeidallah v. Anglin et al
as 2:2017cv00720
Plaintiff:
Dean Obeidallah
Defendant:
Andrew B. Anglin, Moonbase Holdings, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Cox Communications, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv11008
Defendant:
Cox Communications, Inc, Does 1-50, Charles Rodrick, II and others
Plaintiff:
Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thorpe et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 5:2016cv01247
Plaintiff:
Shawn S. Thorpe and Deonshai J. Millender
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP , John Doe Corporation and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houghton v. Heart et al
as 6:2016cv00010
Defendant:
Earl Heart, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Laurence Houghton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Doe et al
as 2:2015cv13786
Plaintiff:
Ethan D Baker
Defendant:
John Doe and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houghton v. Heart et al
as 6:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
Laurence Houghton
Defendant:
Earl Heart, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
