Cases 21 - 30 of 103
Doe v. Doe
as 1:2020cv01002
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tucker v. FBI Headquarters et al
as 2:2019cv13626
Defendant:
Edward Leszynski, Benjamin Egron, Defense Advanced Resarch Project Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tucker
Does 1 through 10 v. Haaland et al
as 2:2019cv00117
Defendant:
Maggie Haberman, Ana Violeta Navarro Flores, Adam Edelen and others
Plaintiff:
John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lagan v. Windle
as 2:2019cv00050
Plaintiff:
Seamus Lagan
Defendant:
John Mark Windle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter v. Consetllis, Inc. dba Constellis et al
as 2:2019cv11462
Plaintiff:
Gary Hunter
Defendant:
Constellis National Security Division, LLC, Centerra, Inc. dba Centerra Integrated Services, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hudgins v. Hamilton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2019cv00326
Defendant:
John/Jane Does #1-10, Hamilton County Sheriff's Office and Sanford Speight
Plaintiff:
Mr. Myron S Hudgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudgins v. Hamilton County Sherif's Office et al
as 1:2019cv00325
Defendant:
Jim Neil, John/Jane Does #1-10, Hamilton County Sherif's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Myron S Hudgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudgins v. Hamilton County Sherif's Office et al
as 1:2019oe00325
Defendant:
Jim Neil, John/Jane Does #1-10, Hamilton County Sherif's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Myron S Hudgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Materna v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02224
Defendant:
JOHN DOE-1 and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Claire Materna
Undetermined:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Mason et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-10, John 1-10 Does, Gary J Bergenske and others
Plaintiff:
F Harrison Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
